跳至主要内容

Award ceremony speech - The Nobel Prize in Literature 2016

 Your Majesties, Your Royal Highnesses, Your Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,

What brings about the great shifts in the world of literature? Often it is when someone seizes upon a simple, overlooked form, discounted as art in the higher sense, and makes it mutate. Thus, at one point, emerged the modern novel from anecdote and letter, thus arose drama in a new age from high jinx on planks placed on barrels in a marketplace, thus songs in the vernacular dethroned learned Latin poetry, thus too did La Fontaine take animal fables and Hans Christian Andersen fairy tales from the nursery to Parnassian heights. Each time this occurs, our idea of literature changes.

In itself, it ought not to be a sensation that a singer/songwriter now stands recipient of the literary Nobel Prize. In a distant past, all poetry was sung or tunefully recited, poets were rhapsodes, bards, troubadours; ‘lyrics’ comes from ‘lyre’. But what Bob Dylan did was not to return to the Greeks or the Provençals. Instead, he dedicated himself body and soul to 20th century American popular music, the kind played on radio stations and gramophone records for ordinary people, white and black: protest songs, country, blues, early rock, gospel, mainstream music. He listened day and night, testing the stuff on his instruments, trying to learn. But when he started to write similar songs, they came out differently. In his hands, the material changed. From what he discovered in heirloom and scrap, in banal rhyme and quick wit, in curses and pious prayers, sweet nothings and crude jokes, he panned poetry gold, whether on purpose or by accident is irrelevant; all creativity begins in imitation.

Even after fifty years of uninterrupted exposure, we are yet to absorb music’s equivalent of the fable’s Flying Dutchman. He makes good rhymes, said a critic, explaining greatness. And it is true. His rhyming is an alchemical substance that dissolves contexts to create new ones, scarcely containable by the human brain. It was a shock. With the public expecting poppy folk songs, there stood a young man with a guitar, fusing the languages of the street and the bible into a compound that would have made the end of the world seem a superfluous replay. At the same time, he sang of love with a power of conviction everyone wants to own. All of a sudden, much of the bookish poetry in our world felt anaemic, and the routine song lyrics his colleagues continued to write were like old-fashioned gunpowder following the invention of dynamite. Soon, people stopped comparing him to Woody Guthrie and Hank Williams and turned instead to Blake, Rimbaud, Whitman, Shakespeare.

In the most unlikely setting of all – the commercial gramophone record – he gave back to the language of poetry its elevated style, lost since the Romantics. Not to sing of eternities, but to speak of what was happening around us. As if the oracle of Delphi were reading the evening news.

Recognising that revolution by awarding Bob Dylan the Nobel Prize was a decision that seemed daring only beforehand and already seems obvious. But does he get the prize for upsetting the system of literature? Not really. There is a simpler explanation, one that we share with all those who stand with beating hearts in front of the stage at one of the venues on his never-ending tour, waiting for that magical voice. Chamfort made the observation that when a master such as La Fontaine appears, the hierarchy of genres – the estimation of what is great and small, high and low in literature – is nullified. “What matter the rank of a work when its beauty is of the highest rank?” he wrote. That is the straight answer to the question of how Bob Dylan belongs in literature: as the beauty of his songs is of the highest rank.

By means of his oeuvre, Bob Dylan has changed our idea of what poetry can be and how it can work. He is a singer worthy of a place beside the Greeks’ ἀοιδόι, beside Ovid, beside the Romantic visionaries, beside the kings and queens of the Blues, beside the forgotten masters of brilliant standards. If people in the literary world groan, one must remind them that the gods don’t write, they dance and they sing. The good wishes of the Swedish Academy follow Mr. Dylan on his way to coming bandstands.

Popular posts from 产品随想的博客

巴菲特致股东信-1980年

 笔记: 会计中对于下属股权公司的记账方式有3种: 持股50%以上,全部并入 持续20%--50%,则按持股比例并入 持股20%以下,则以实际收到的利润返还,计入报表 这种会计方式,会导致伯克希尔旗下,不少的企业,未能暴露实际的收益情况 对伯克希尔而言,对盈余的认定并非取决于持股比例是100%,50%,20%,5%或是1%,盈余的真正价值在于其将来再投资所能产生的效益 我们宁愿将所赚的盈余继续交由不受我们控制的人好好发挥,也不希望转由我们自己来浪费 高通货膨胀等于是对投入的资本额外课了一次税 翻译: https://xueqiu.com/6217262310/131837878 https://archive.ph/XMX5n  原文: Buffett’s Letters To Berkshire Shareholders 1980 巴菲特致股东的信 1980 年 Operating earnings improved to $41.9 million in 1980 from $36.0 million in 1979, but return on beginning equity capital (with securities valued at cost) fell to 17.8% from 18.6%. We believe the latter yardstick to be the most appropriate measure of single-year managerial economic performance. Informed use of that yardstick, however, requires an understanding of many factors, including accounting policies, historical ca...

SS机场常用服务器线路微普及

原文link:https://www.duyaoss.com/archives/57/   为何写这么个帖子? 更新时间:2019-11-29 由于机场用户增多,很多新用户压根不懂节点上面的名字代表什么,也不知道什么服务器比较适合自己,不懂什么是原生,等等。 所以开一个小帖,稍微介绍一下比较常见的服务器, 专业知识有限,所以只是给小白们介绍一下,其实我也很白,各位大佬见笑了。 在这里尤其感谢 Sukka 苏卡卡大佬和喵酱指导,以及 Nexitally 佩奇提供的资料介绍,否则我真不知道从哪儿开始动笔。后面地区内容都是佩奇帮忙码出来的。时间有限,慢慢再继续填充和修整 本文仅仅是抛砖引玉写一些机场主们告知我的 ISP、IDC 的体验,仅供参考。网络环境每天都在变化,今天飞快的服务器明天有可能龟速,有写的不对或者过时的地方还望大家指正。所以本文也算是一些机场主们把曾经踩过的坑分享给大家吧。(本来是想给小白写服务器介绍的,佩奇大佬写着写着就专业惯性的转到了商家哈哈哈,这是一个悲伤的故事) 测速图 Telegram 频道: https://t.me/DuyaoSS 主用链接: DuyaoSS - 毒药机场简介博客 常见名词: IPLC: "International Private Leased Circuit"的缩写,即“国际专线”。不过大部分机场通常看到的iplc,都只是阿里的经典网络,跨数据中心内网互通,阿里内网,并不是严格意义的iplc专线;当然也有其他渠道的,或真iplc,不过比较少。阿里云的内网互通底层原理是通过采购多个点对点的iplc专线,来连接各个数据中心,从而把各个数据中心纳入到自己的一套内网里面来。这样做有两个好处,其一是iplc链路上的带宽独享,完全不受公网波动影响,其二是过境的时候不需要经过GFW,确保了数据安全且不受外界各种因素干扰。但是需要注意一下阿里云的iplc也是有带宽上限的,如果过多的人同时挤到同一条专线上,峰值带宽超过专线的上限的话也同样会造成网络不稳定。其他渠道购买到的iplc价格很高,阿里云内网这种性价比超高这种好东西且用且珍惜。 IEPL国际以太网专线(International Ethernet Private Line,简称IEPL),构建于MSTP设备平台上...

360T7 刷机步骤及固件

https://cmi.hanwckf.top/p/360t7-firmware/   360T7的固件支持由immortalwrt-mt798x项目提供支持,请参考: https://cmi.hanwckf.top/p/immortalwrt-mt798x https://github.com/hanwckf/immortalwrt-mt798x 刷机步骤 参考 此处 的办法开启原厂固件的UART和telnet功能 在以下链接下载360T7测试固件(纯净版,无任何插件) https://wwd.lanzout.com/b0bt9idwd 密码:ezex (此固件已过时,请选择其它更新的固件) 接下来将刷入修改版uboot。修改版uboot的优点有: 固件分区可达108MB,原厂uboot只能使用36M 自带一个简单的webui恢复页面 到以下仓库的Release页面下载uboot,目前暂时仅支持360T7,后续将支持更多mt798x路由器。 推荐使用 mt7981_360t7-fip-fixed-parts.bin , fixed-parts 代表uboot分区表在编译期间固定,不会随着uboot环境变量变化。 https://github.com/hanwckf/bl-mt798x/releases/latest 将 mt7981_360t7-fip-fixed-parts.bin 通过HFS等方式上传到路由器,使用以下命令刷入uboot mtd write mt7981_360t7-fip-fixed-parts.bin fip 确认刷入完毕后,拔掉路由器电源。然后将电脑的IP地址设置为固定的 192.168.1.2 ,接着按住路由器的RESET按钮后通电开机,等待8s后用浏览器进入 192.168.1.1 在uboot恢复页面选择要刷入的固件。immortalwrt-mt798x目前编译两个版本的360T7固件。 建议修改版uboot直接使用 immortalwrt-mediatek-mt7981-mt7981-360-t7-108M-squashfs-factory.bin ,两种固件区别如下: mt7981-360-t7-108M 为108M固件分区,原厂uboot不可启动,需要修改版u...

黑客讲述渗透Hacking Team全过程

原文地址在 Freebuf ,后来已经被删除 Wayback Machine 备份 近期,黑客 Phineas Fisher在pastebin.com上讲述了入侵Hacking Team的过程,以下为其讲述的原文情况,文中附带有相关文档、工具及网站的链接,请在安全环境下进行打开,并合理合法使用。作者部分思想较为激进,也请以辩证的观点看待之。 1、序言 在这里,可能你会注意到相比于前面的一个版本,这个版本的内容及语言有了一些变化,因为这将是最后一个版本了 [1] 。对于黑客技术,英语世界中已经有了许多书籍,讲座,指南以及关于黑客攻击的知识。在那个世界,有许多黑客比我优秀,但他们埋没了他们的天赋,而为所谓的“防护”服务商(如Hacking Team之流的),情报机构服务工作。黑客文化作为一项非主流文化诞生于美国,但它现在只保留了它本质的魅力,其他均被同化了。从黑客的本质出发,至少他们可以穿着一件T恤,把头发染成蓝色,用自己的黑客的名字,随意 洒脱 地做着自己喜欢的事件,而当他们为别人(前文所指的 Hacking Team及情报机构 )工作的时候,会感觉自己像个反抗者。 如果按照传统的方式,你不得不潜入办公室偷偷拿到文件[2],或者你不得不持枪抢劫银行。但现在你仅仅需要一台笔记本,躺在床上动动手指便可做得这一切[3][4]。像CNT在入侵伽玛集团(Gamma Group)之后说的,“让我们以一种新的斗争方式向前迈进吧”[5]。 [ 1 ] http: / /pastebin.com/raw .php?i=cRYvK4jb [ 2 ] https: / /en.wikipedia.org/wiki /Citizens%27_Commission_to_Investigate_the_FBI [3] http:/ /www.aljazeera.com/news /2015/ 09/algerian-hacker-hero-hoodlum- 15092108 3914167 .html [ 4 ] https: / /securelist.com/files /2015/ 02 /Carbanak_APT_eng.pdf  [ 5 ] http: / /madrid.cnt.es/noticia /consideraci...

Albert Einstein Said Death Is Not An End Can Prompt You To Find The Meaning and Purpose Of Your Life

原文Link: https://quotationize.com/albert-einstein-said-death-not-end/ 产品随想注: 爱因斯坦对于死亡的观点,深深影响了乔布斯  ---------------- Albert Einstein said death is not an end if we can live on in our children and the younger generation is a line taken from the letter which he wrote to the widow of physicist Heike Kamerlingh Onnes in 1926. Besides death, he also talked about afterlife, immortality and soul. If you have read through my authentic collection of Albert Einstein thoughts on God and religion , you would know that he rejected the formal, dogmatic religion. Einstein did not believe in immortality of the individual. According to him, there is no such thing as, punishment for misdeeds or rewards for good behavior in any afterlife. For him, the so-called Theosophy and Spiritualism, was no more than a symptom of weakness and confusion. As Einstein explained that since our inner experiences consist of reproductions, and combinations of sensory impressions, the concept of a soul with...

产品随想 | 周刊 第85期:e-Residency与数字游民

  David Shambaugh   https://www.google.com/search?q=David+Shambaugh 中国问题研究专家,著作极多 郭玉闪   https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/郭玉闪?useskin=vector 中国公共知识分子 我只想好好观影   github.com/BetterWorld-Liuser/autoMovies 刘煜辉:中国资本市场灵魂出窍 最有活力的公司几乎不在A股   https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/marketresearch/2017-06-23/doc-ifyhmtek7705574.shtml 回看17年的专家讲话,还是挺有水平的,挺多都认可 纽约文化沙龙   https://www.youtube.com/@user-cu2hl5tf6y/videos 视频质量出奇的高,推荐 透视中国政治by吴国光、程晓农 备忘下,貌似评价挺好的一本书 CAPI China Chair Wu Guoguang (吴国光 / 吳國光)   https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLIt1szHhnm_Hso3jGUbfGpnEAbsPOuEVV 因为热爱中国,我们越要看懂中国 AI Canon   https://a16z.com/2023/05/25/ai-canon/ in this post, we’re sharing a curated list of resources we’ve relied on to get smarter about modern AI. We call it the “AI Canon” because these papers, blog posts, courses, and guides have had an outsized impact on the field over the past several years. 希望中国的投資機構,也能有更多的分享與輸出,提升整個社會的認知 Cantonese Font 粵語字體   https://visual-fonts.com/zh/...

Interview with Steve Jobs, WGBH, 1990

Interviewer: what is it about this machine? Why is this machine so interesting? Why has it been so influential? Jobs: Ah ahm, I'll give you my point of view on it. I remember reading a magazine article a long time ago ah when I was ah twelve years ago maybe, in I think it was Scientific American . I'm not sure. And the article ahm proposed to measure the efficiency of locomotion for ah lots of species on planet earth to see which species was the most efficient at getting from point A to point B. Ah and they measured the kilocalories that each one expended. So ah they ranked them all and I remember that ahm...ah the Condor, Condor was the most efficient at [CLEARS THROAT] getting from point A to point B. And humankind, the crown of creation came in with a rather unimpressive showing about a third of the way down...

产品爱好者周刊 第26期:PRISM, XKeyscore, Trust No One

  Products Gitea - Git with a cup of tea   https://gitea.io/en-us/ A painless self-hosted Git service. 自建Git服务,避免GitHub隐私侵犯 https://github.com/objective-see/LuLu LuLu is the free macOS firewall 监视Mac的出站流量,且阻断 OverSight   https://github.com/objective-see/OverSight OverSight monitors a mac's mic and webcam, alerting the user when the internal mic is activated, or whenever a process accesses the webcam. 监视是否有应用调用Mac的麦克风、摄像头 Mozilla Hubs   https://github.com/mozilla/hubs The client-side code for Mozilla Hubs, an online 3D collaboration platform that works for desktop, mobile, and VR platforms. 开源的多人虚拟空间,Mozilla打造,企业级VR诉求 数字移民   https://shuziyimin.org 关于内容源、工具的推荐,适合刚接入国际的新人 SimpleLogin   https://simplelogin.io/ 匿名邮箱工具,转发用,Michael Bazzell推荐 Telegram 群组、频道、机器人 - 汇总分享   https://congcong0806.github.io/2018/04/24/Telegram/#机器人-bot https://archive.ph/iJMBj 献给那些将来到Telegram的朋友 Design Patrick Wardle   https://www.instagram.com/patrickwardle/?hl=en 他的IG,摄影也精彩,审美...

Apple's One-Dollar-a-Year Man, By Steve Jobs, 2000

(FORTUNE Magazine) – Now that Steve Jobs has showed his hand on Apple's Internet and system software strategies and dropped the "interim" from his title, other questions loom. He's always denied it, but isn't it true that his old company, Next, did wind up taking over Apple? Will there ever be an encore to the 15-year-old Macintosh? Short of that, does Apple have any plans to jump into the "Internet appliance" fray? Will Apple ever build computers for business people again? And what, pray tell, does Steve think of all these young Internet zillionaires? Let's ask. Practically every technology that your old company, Next, possessed when Apple acquired it in 1997 is now being used by Apple in some strategic way. This must seem like sweet vindication.  The thing about Next was that we produced something that was truly brilliant for an audience that our heart really wasn't into selling to--namely, the enterprise. I suppose if you were wr...

A Sister’s Eulogy for Steve Jobs

I grew up as an only child, with a single mother. Because we were poor and because I knew my father had emigrated from Syria, I imagined he looked like Omar Sharif. I hoped he would be rich and kind and would come into our lives (and our not yet furnished apartment) and help us. Later, after I’d met my father, I tried to believe he’d changed his number and left no forwarding address because he was an idealistic revolutionary, plotting a new world for the Arab people. Even as a feminist, my whole life I’d been waiting for a man to love, who could love me. For decades, I’d thought that man would be my father. When I was 25, I met that man and he was my brother. By then, I lived in New York, where I was trying to write my first novel. I had a job at a small magazine in an office the size of a closet, with three other aspiring writers. When one day a lawyer called me — me, the middle-class girl from California who hassled the boss to buy us health insurance — and said his cl...