跳至主要内容

Award ceremony speech - The Nobel Prize in Literature 2016

 Your Majesties, Your Royal Highnesses, Your Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,

What brings about the great shifts in the world of literature? Often it is when someone seizes upon a simple, overlooked form, discounted as art in the higher sense, and makes it mutate. Thus, at one point, emerged the modern novel from anecdote and letter, thus arose drama in a new age from high jinx on planks placed on barrels in a marketplace, thus songs in the vernacular dethroned learned Latin poetry, thus too did La Fontaine take animal fables and Hans Christian Andersen fairy tales from the nursery to Parnassian heights. Each time this occurs, our idea of literature changes.

In itself, it ought not to be a sensation that a singer/songwriter now stands recipient of the literary Nobel Prize. In a distant past, all poetry was sung or tunefully recited, poets were rhapsodes, bards, troubadours; ‘lyrics’ comes from ‘lyre’. But what Bob Dylan did was not to return to the Greeks or the Provençals. Instead, he dedicated himself body and soul to 20th century American popular music, the kind played on radio stations and gramophone records for ordinary people, white and black: protest songs, country, blues, early rock, gospel, mainstream music. He listened day and night, testing the stuff on his instruments, trying to learn. But when he started to write similar songs, they came out differently. In his hands, the material changed. From what he discovered in heirloom and scrap, in banal rhyme and quick wit, in curses and pious prayers, sweet nothings and crude jokes, he panned poetry gold, whether on purpose or by accident is irrelevant; all creativity begins in imitation.

Even after fifty years of uninterrupted exposure, we are yet to absorb music’s equivalent of the fable’s Flying Dutchman. He makes good rhymes, said a critic, explaining greatness. And it is true. His rhyming is an alchemical substance that dissolves contexts to create new ones, scarcely containable by the human brain. It was a shock. With the public expecting poppy folk songs, there stood a young man with a guitar, fusing the languages of the street and the bible into a compound that would have made the end of the world seem a superfluous replay. At the same time, he sang of love with a power of conviction everyone wants to own. All of a sudden, much of the bookish poetry in our world felt anaemic, and the routine song lyrics his colleagues continued to write were like old-fashioned gunpowder following the invention of dynamite. Soon, people stopped comparing him to Woody Guthrie and Hank Williams and turned instead to Blake, Rimbaud, Whitman, Shakespeare.

In the most unlikely setting of all – the commercial gramophone record – he gave back to the language of poetry its elevated style, lost since the Romantics. Not to sing of eternities, but to speak of what was happening around us. As if the oracle of Delphi were reading the evening news.

Recognising that revolution by awarding Bob Dylan the Nobel Prize was a decision that seemed daring only beforehand and already seems obvious. But does he get the prize for upsetting the system of literature? Not really. There is a simpler explanation, one that we share with all those who stand with beating hearts in front of the stage at one of the venues on his never-ending tour, waiting for that magical voice. Chamfort made the observation that when a master such as La Fontaine appears, the hierarchy of genres – the estimation of what is great and small, high and low in literature – is nullified. “What matter the rank of a work when its beauty is of the highest rank?” he wrote. That is the straight answer to the question of how Bob Dylan belongs in literature: as the beauty of his songs is of the highest rank.

By means of his oeuvre, Bob Dylan has changed our idea of what poetry can be and how it can work. He is a singer worthy of a place beside the Greeks’ ἀοιδόι, beside Ovid, beside the Romantic visionaries, beside the kings and queens of the Blues, beside the forgotten masters of brilliant standards. If people in the literary world groan, one must remind them that the gods don’t write, they dance and they sing. The good wishes of the Swedish Academy follow Mr. Dylan on his way to coming bandstands.

Popular posts from 产品随想的博客

Rhino_GH从入门到精通听课笔记_二

一. 基础操作   1. Rhino F6精确更改相机视野   2. 中键和左菜单栏弹出时间都是可以自己设置缩短的 二. 软件技巧   1. GH搭配生成楼梯,柱子,栏杆   2. SU\3DS\OBJ 均可被Rhino识别   3. 已命名工作位置很有用,和和已命名是图标是不一样的   4. Rhino等轴测做法          显示——投影——改为平行          旋转改为0/360          视图——等角视图 三. 奇技淫巧   1. 善用微信搜索,比如“地形制作”,第三讲前半部分讲解利用高程点制作地形   2. Rhino转折剖制作方法,用面split模型,即模型被切成两个,类似于佐罗刀   3. 转折剖模型制作时间很久,工作量比较大 四. Rhino命令   1. worksession  链接文件进来,以一个图层显示,类似于SU里面的另存再载入的操作,可       以节省运算量,比ctrl+c ctrl+v快   2. ctrl+w  局部放大   3. hatch  嵌面

BG投资十问(Baillie Gifford)

  1,公司是否能正面推动经济、社会或者文化发 展? 如果做不到,BG可能就不会再往下看了。比如军火、赌博类公司再便宜,BG不会去看。 2,公司销售额在5年之内能否翻倍? 为什么要讨论销售额?因为BG关注公司成长,销售额是比较简单直观的指标,而利润可有一些方法调节。所以,BG主要先关注销售额,再看现金流。 3,公司5年之后会怎么样? 这是未来5到10年或者5到15年的中间维度,一是看公司的成长空间究竟还有多大,二是考虑5年之后,公司的短期估值会不会下降,会不会变得成熟。 4,公司的竞争优势到底是什么?随着时间会变 强还是变弱? BG认为,如果公司的竞争优势是不断变弱的,将来在更远期挣回现金流的可能性就更低了。 5,公司是否有非常独特的文化?文化是否能够进化? 毕竟要投资这么长时间,对创始人和公司管理文化是非常关注的。特别喜欢创始人领导的公司,而不是说创始人什么都不干,创始人在做房地产,找了一些人在做新公司,要尽量避免这样的公司。 谈到进化在BG看来,大部分公司都会有大公司病,需要看它怎么能维持比较灵活的管理,变大之后还能够保持非常快速的成长,比如亚马逊的day one文化(注:就是始终处在 创业启动状态,充满迷茫和压力,但是充满创造力和颠覆思想 )。 6,公司过去的回报率怎么样? 一方面是考虑到公司的ROE(净资产收益率),二是考虑公司的Margins(利润),看它的过去是不是值得投资,如果每年ROE都不到10个点,可能长期来看也没什么意思。 7,ROE能不能随着时间增长? 有些公司一开始没有盈利,一直在烧钱,5年之后说不定ROE会到20%或者更高,它是一个动态过程。这样的公司BG也会投资,包括一些早期项目,很多公司都是没有盈利的。 8,公司怎么分配资本? 资本现金流无非就是5种方法:再投资、收购、还债、分红、回购股份,要看公司在某个阶段的资本分配是不是最优的。 如果公司明明可以发展更多,结果乱分红了;或者是明明到了特别成熟的时候,还不愿意分红,都是错误的分配资本。 9,公司怎样才能长成5倍? BG关注的是怎样,而不是能不能。这会强迫BG每个人去设想一些未来的可能性,包括公司现在的底层架构能不能够延伸到更多的业务。 比如,早期的亚马逊或者是阿里,连一个概念都没有,BG会考虑这个公司有没有这种机遇,以后去扩展到可触及的市场。 10,市场对公司有哪些误解,哪些事...

The Three Faces Of Steve Jobs, Brent Schlender, 1998 Fortune

(FORTUNE Magazine) – Well into the conversation with FORTUNE that you're about to read, Steve Jobs, the once and interim CEO of Apple Computer, professes to feel, at the wizened age of 43, no different from when he was a frisky 17-year-old. True to form, he contradicts himself a little later, confessing to be "an old man now." Those comments reveal as much about why Jobs has been able to pull off his prestidigital revival of Apple--his first and still greatest creation--as do his observations on his business strategies and actions of the past year. Here's why. Jobs is most effective as a businessman and leader when he invokes the pathos and gestalt of his generation. He is, after all, a child of the 1960s--you're still likely to find him barefoot in the office, and for breakfast he eats granola doused in apple juice. Yet Jobs is also a mature baby-boomer, with an impressive if offbeat store of business experience, plus the typical worries that go with...

CAD 天正与 AI 工作流

基本步骤   1. 天正导出 T3 .dwg 文件,尽量在2007版本   2. AI 打开,打开时候可以选择比例,因为 AI 画布是基于真实尺度   3. AI 打开 .dwg 后,更改画布到所需要的大小   4. 之后用 PS 打开 AI 文件,可以维持想要的大小和比例   5. 而且 AI 可以读取天正的图层 课外了解   1. ETH 风格平面图   2. 日本创新性的停车方式   3. AI中的实时上色功能去了解

产品爱好者周刊 第36期:走进Linux

Products OpenShot   https://github.com/OpenShot/openshot-qt OpenShot Video Editor is an award-winning free and open-source video editor for Linux, Mac, and Windows 开源的视频剪辑工具,跨平台 Run   https://github.com/The-Run-Philosophy-Organization/run 润学全球官方指定GITHUB,整理润学宗旨、纲领、理论和各类润之实例 Dozer   https://github.com/Mortennn/Dozer Hide menu bar icons on macOS ThisIsWin11   https://github.com/builtbybel/ThisIsWin11 Win11的隐私保护 RoundedTB   https://github.com/torchgm/RoundedTB Add margins, rounded corners and segments to your taskbars! Droptop Four   https://github.com/Droptop-Four/Basic-Version Droptop Four is the fourth iteration of the popular dropdown app launcher for Windows & Rainmeter. LibreTube   https://github.com/Libre-tube/LibreTube An alternative frontend for YouTube, for Android. nheko   https://github.com/Nheko-Reborn/nheko Quaternion   https://github.com/quotient-im/Quaternion 多平台的Matrix客户端 FluffyChat   https://fluffychat.im/ Phone端的Matrix...

Steve Jobs: `There's Sanity Returning', 1998

Nobody can doubt the charisma of Steven P. Jobs. The interim CEO of Apple Computer Inc., who returned to the company last July after his ignominious 1985 ouster, has brought back his legendary vision, impatience, and infectious passion for the Macintosh. Jobs spoke to Business Week Correspondent Andy Reinhardt in Apple's stark, fourth-floor boardroom, just after the company rolled out its new software strategy on May 11. Note: This is an extended, online-only version of the Q&A that appears in the May 25, 1998, issue of Business Week. Q: Now that you've introduced the new, bold-looking iMac, are you going to do some radically different products? A: There's a lot of talk about such things -- about handhelds, set-top boxes. A lot of computer companies have been searching for a consumer product. My view is that the personal computer has been the most successful consumer product of the last 10 years. What we have to do, what the industry stopp...

零碎思考 | 關於LLM的閱讀筆記

  通向AGI之路:大型语言模型(LLM)技术精要   https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/597586623 拆解追溯 GPT-3.5 各项能力的起源   https://yaofu.notion.site/GPT-3-5-360081d91ec245f29029d37b54573756 清晰明瞭 A Closer Look at Large Language Models Emergent Abilities   https://yaofu.notion.site/A-Closer-Look-at-Large-Language-Models-Emergent-Abilities-493876b55df5479d80686f68a1abd72f 試圖說明LLM的涌現能力] 如何利用GPT-4打造高效智能信息收集神器   https://lpcv.org/fwc/a/MzU0MDk3NTUxMA==/2247483868/1 學習思路 GPT-4编码教程,如何用AI构建和宣传我的Midjourney网站增强插件   https://op7418.zhubai.love/posts/2254193381183922176 AUTOMATIC1111 GUI: A Beginner’s Guide   https://stable-diffusion-art.com/automatic1111/ 其實就是AI界的雲渲染,挺有意思的 Midjourney还是Stable Diffusion: 你应该选哪个?   https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/617157677 看到作者下方的“註冊會計師”,中國太卷了 树莓派4B刷OpenWrt做路由器的经验+踩坑   https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/451788328 關注其中的坑點 doc.openwrt.cc   https://doc.openwrt.cc/

世界需要什么样的智能系统

原文: - By 道哥 - Link:https://archive.ph/h0nNj  笔记: - 人工智能,不应该是一个产业,应该是各个产业,都要有智能; - 智能:感知+行动 (目前很多视觉、语音的识别,停留在感知层面) - 智能技术角度看, 自动驾驶与智能音箱是两个完整的从“感知”到“行动”的闭环     - 对话机器人被成为人工智能界的圣杯 - 构建智能时代:     - 飞行员:各个企业中,智能部门的员工     - 航道:基础设施提供商,比如运营商、云计算厂商     - 机场:最后真正的商业模式,类似苹果的App Store,给机器智能系统提供服务 - 机器与机器的协同交互,价值巨大(以往很看重的是:机器与人的交互) - 数据、训练在内部;一旦进行外部的机器交流,默认为“不信任”模式 - 云计算厂商可能会被智能厂商管道化,就跟运营商被互联网内容提供商管道化一样(因为:云计算和大数据都不是智能)

红楼梦十二曲——终身误

都道是金玉良缘,俺只念木石前盟。 空对着山中高士晶莹雪,终不忘世外仙姝寂寞林。 叹人间美中不足今方信。 纵然是齐眉举案,到底意难平。