Steve was a natural performer who elevated business presentations to something close to high art. But what made him fidgety this day was the prospect of addressing the Stanford University graduating class of 2005. University president John Hennessy had broached the idea several months earlier, and after taking just a little time to think it over, Steve had said yes. He was offered speaking engagements constantly, and he always said no. In fact, he was asked to do so many commencement addresses that it became a running joke with Laurene and other friends who had college or graduate degrees: Steve said he’d accept one just to make an end run around them and get his PhD in a day, versus the years and years it had taken them. But in the end, saying no was simply a question of return on investment—conferences and public speaking seemed to offer a meager payoff compared to other things, like a dazzling MacWorld presentation, working on a great product, or being around his family. “If you look closely at how he spent his time,” says Tim Cook, “you’ll see that he hardly ever traveled and he did none of the conferences and get-togethers that so many CEOs attend. He wanted to be home for dinner.”
Stanford was different, even though speaking there would not turn Steve into Dr. Jobs—the school did not offer honorary degrees. For starters, he wouldn’t have to travel or miss dinner, since it was possible for him to drive from his house to the university in just seven minutes. More important, the university was deeply tied into the Silicon Valley tech community in a way he admired. Its education was first-rate and the professors he’d met through the years, like Jim Collins, were top caliber. Despite being a dropout, he always enjoyed spending time around smart college students. “He was only going to do one commencement speech,” says Laurene, “and if it was going to be anywhere it was going to be at Stanford.”
1)能回家吃饭;2)斯坦福与硅谷联系紧密;3)ROI高,斯坦福学生可以加入苹果Getting around to writing the speech proved to be something of a bother. Steve had talked to a few friends about what to say, and he had even asked the screenwriter Aaron Sorkin for some thoughts. But nothing came of all that, so finally he decided to write it himself. He wrote up a draft one night, and then started bouncing ideas off Laurene, Tim Cook, and a couple of others. “He really wanted to get it right,” says Laurene. “He wanted it to say something he really cared about.” The language changed slightly, but its structure, which summed up his essential values in three vignettes, remained the same. In the days before the event he would recite it while walking around the house, from the bedroom upstairs to the kitchen below, the kids watching their dad spring past them in the same kind of trance he’d sometimes enter in the days before MacWorld or Apple’s Worldwide Developers Conference. Several times he read it to the whole family at dinner.
这就是我们觉得斯坦福毕业演讲这么好的原因!!!From his earliest days, Steve had always been able to spin a tale. But nothing he ever said before resonated this way. The speech has been viewed at least 35 million times on YouTube. It didn’t go viral, in the way of a Web phenomenon of 2015—social networks weren’t as developed or extensive a decade ago. But it gradually became recognized as something truly exceptional, of great meaning to a world of people beyond the Stanford Stadium as well. Its popularity surprised him. “None of us expected it to take off like that,” says Katie Cotton, who headed up communications and PR for Apple at the time.
公关老大都震惊了,哈哈哈Collins has specialized in the study of what makes great companies tick, and what marks the people who lead them. He sees something unique in Steve’s unorthodox business education. “I used to call him the Beethoven of business,” he says, “but that’s more true of when he was young. When Steve was twenty-two, you could consider him a genius with a thousand helpers. But he grew way beyond that. He’s not a success story, but a growth story. It’s truly remarkable to go from being a great artist to being a great company builder.”
“The narrative that was created around Steve 1.0 has dominated,” says Collins. “That’s partly because the story of a man who matured slowly into a seasoned leader is less interesting. Learning how to have disposable cash flow, and how to pick the right people, and growing, and rounding off the sharp edges, and not merely acting strange—that’s not as interesting! But all that personality stuff is just the packaging, the window dressing. What’s the truth of your ambition? Do you have the humility to continually grow, to learn from your failures and get back up? Are you utterly relentless for your cause, ferocious for your cause? Can you channel your intensity and intelligence and energy and talents and gifts and ideas outward into something that is bigger and more impactful than you are? That’s what great leadership is about.”
WHEN I FIRST read the speech online, I remembered an interview I’d conducted with Steve in 1998. We had been talking about the trajectory of his career when, in a rambling aside not unlike the road on the back cover of the last issue of the Whole Earth Catalog, Steve told me about the impact that the Catalog had had upon him. “I think back to it when I am trying to remind myself of what to do, of what’s the right thing to do.” A few weeks after that interview had been published in Fortune, I received an envelope in the mail. It was from Stewart Brand, and it contained a rare copy of that final issue. “Please give this to Steve next time you see him,” Stewart asked. When I did, a week or two later, Steve was thrilled. He’d remembered the issue for all those years, but had never had the time to locate a copy for himself.
The end of the Stanford speech focuses on the Catalog’s back-cover motto, “Stay Hungry. Stay Foolish,” but my favorite line about the catalog in Steve’s speech is when he describes it as “idealistic, and overflowing with neat tools and great notions.” This is, in fact, a lovely description of Steve’s companies at their best. He was an empathetic man who wanted these graduates to head off on foolish, hungry pursuits, and who wanted to give them neat tools and great notions as they began their winding journey. Like Jim Collins, I had gotten close enough to Steve to see beyond his harshness and the occasional outright rudeness to the idealist within. Sometimes it was hard to convey this idealism to others, given Steve’s intensity and unpredictably sharp elbows. The Stanford commencement speech gave the world a glimpse of that genuine idealism.
好巧,我也喜欢那一句!!!
“idealistic, and overflowing with neat tools and great notions.”
Products 玛拉蒂家具/座椅: https://www.maratti.com.cn/ 上海的一家办公家具供应商,公司实际坐过,非常舒服 DocuSign: https://www.docusign.com/ 给PDF电子签名,看评价有不错的声誉 https://bridges.torproject.org/ 获取Tor网桥 塞冬: https://www.zhihu.com/people/qiancai_saidong 此人的长文分析,挺有insight,来自北大 公众号平台已沉默 客观来说,韩国有什么地方超越了日本和中国? - 塞冬的回答 - 知乎 https://www.zhihu.com/question/60428819/answer/369420091 高端造船、芯片闪存、显示技术 Design 折叠屏设计的一些思考: 10多年前互联网的网站设计: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/OdFjta4Wetp1p67bRrmYqw https://archive.ph/TdI1L Business & Market data 未来人口四倍于中国的非洲,我们该如何面对: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/7V2IgW3db1uRR3_wa8S1OQ 在数十年后,非洲也会是类似于印度、东南亚那样的机会 周深在节目中唱歌:一般2首,120W+ 一个有些违反认知的事实是,1966年的上海综合工业实力媲美台湾、香港。 https://metrics.torproject.org/userstats-relay-country.html Tor的运营系列数据 牢记:中国还是一个人均中位数年收入只有2.2万元、90%的三口之家年收入低于20万、20%的三口之家年收入低于1万8的发展中大国。 全国人均GDP尚未达到1万美元(欧洲落后地区水平),最富裕的京沪人均GDP也刚摸到2万美元门槛(欧洲中等偏下水平) 美国家庭收入中位数是42万人民币(税前),家庭税前年收入75万人民币可以打败3/4的美国家庭,120万可以打败90%,160万可以打败95%(2017-2018,基于2014美国普查数据预估,如下图) 超低生育率养成记: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/C80z...