跳至主要内容

BG投资十问(Baillie Gifford)

 1,公司是否能正面推动经济、社会或者文化发展?


如果做不到,BG可能就不会再往下看了。比如军火、赌博类公司再便宜,BG不会去看。

2,公司销售额在5年之内能否翻倍?

为什么要讨论销售额?因为BG关注公司成长,销售额是比较简单直观的指标,而利润可有一些方法调节。所以,BG主要先关注销售额,再看现金流。

3,公司5年之后会怎么样?

这是未来5到10年或者5到15年的中间维度,一是看公司的成长空间究竟还有多大,二是考虑5年之后,公司的短期估值会不会下降,会不会变得成熟。

4,公司的竞争优势到底是什么?随着时间会变强还是变弱?

BG认为,如果公司的竞争优势是不断变弱的,将来在更远期挣回现金流的可能性就更低了。

5,公司是否有非常独特的文化?文化是否能够进化?

毕竟要投资这么长时间,对创始人和公司管理文化是非常关注的。特别喜欢创始人领导的公司,而不是说创始人什么都不干,创始人在做房地产,找了一些人在做新公司,要尽量避免这样的公司。

谈到进化在BG看来,大部分公司都会有大公司病,需要看它怎么能维持比较灵活的管理,变大之后还能够保持非常快速的成长,比如亚马逊的day one文化(注:就是始终处在创业启动状态,充满迷茫和压力,但是充满创造力和颠覆思想)。

6,公司过去的回报率怎么样?

一方面是考虑到公司的ROE(净资产收益率),二是考虑公司的Margins(利润),看它的过去是不是值得投资,如果每年ROE都不到10个点,可能长期来看也没什么意思。

7,ROE能不能随着时间增长?

有些公司一开始没有盈利,一直在烧钱,5年之后说不定ROE会到20%或者更高,它是一个动态过程。这样的公司BG也会投资,包括一些早期项目,很多公司都是没有盈利的。

8,公司怎么分配资本?

资本现金流无非就是5种方法:再投资、收购、还债、分红、回购股份,要看公司在某个阶段的资本分配是不是最优的。

如果公司明明可以发展更多,结果乱分红了;或者是明明到了特别成熟的时候,还不愿意分红,都是错误的分配资本。

9,公司怎样才能长成5倍?

BG关注的是怎样,而不是能不能。这会强迫BG每个人去设想一些未来的可能性,包括公司现在的底层架构能不能够延伸到更多的业务。

比如,早期的亚马逊或者是阿里,连一个概念都没有,BG会考虑这个公司有没有这种机遇,以后去扩展到可触及的市场。

10,市场对公司有哪些误解,哪些事情是市场没有反映出来的?

Popular posts from 产品随想的博客

产品随想 | 周刊 第130期:集结信徒,而非官僚

On Dyson, techno-centric design and social consumption   https://2earth.github.io/website/20250707.html 如何創造偉大的事物   https://ryolu.notion.site/1610a94b9c108079a95be4362afd4a26 集結信徒,而非官僚 Reflections on OpenAI   https://calv.info/openai-reflections 创业架构 Shui   https://github.com/rock-zhang/Shui 好好喝水 https://www.ghibli.jp/works/ 吉卜力作品的高清图 From Skeuomorphic to Liquid Glass: Apple's Strategic Bet on the Post-Touch Future   https://omc345.substack.com/p/from-skeuomorphic-to-liquid-glass 迄今为止关于苹果Liquid Glass变革的解读,最好的一篇 The Nueva School   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Nueva_School?useskin=vector 看起来是很酷的一个学校 The Barbican   https://arslan.io/2025/05/12/barbican-estate/ 史蒂夫·乔布斯希望你阅读的 9 本书   https://www.douban.com/doulist/147158849/ 《禅者的初心》里有句话:“做任何事,其实都是在展示内心的天性,这是我们存在的唯一理由。” Chuck Feeney was one of the greatest philanthropists ever   https://www.gatesnotes.com/Remembering-Chuck-Feeney 慈善家 My new deadline: 20 years to give away virtually all my wealt...

A Sister’s Eulogy for Steve Jobs

I grew up as an only child, with a single mother. Because we were poor and because I knew my father had emigrated from Syria, I imagined he looked like Omar Sharif. I hoped he would be rich and kind and would come into our lives (and our not yet furnished apartment) and help us. Later, after I’d met my father, I tried to believe he’d changed his number and left no forwarding address because he was an idealistic revolutionary, plotting a new world for the Arab people. Even as a feminist, my whole life I’d been waiting for a man to love, who could love me. For decades, I’d thought that man would be my father. When I was 25, I met that man and he was my brother. By then, I lived in New York, where I was trying to write my first novel. I had a job at a small magazine in an office the size of a closet, with three other aspiring writers. When one day a lawyer called me — me, the middle-class girl from California who hassled the boss to buy us health insurance — and said his cl...

《Becoming Steve Jobs》Chapter 16 Blind Spots, Grudges, and Sharp Elbows

Steve could be pretty thin-skinned when someone prominent criticized the aesthetics of his products. He took great umbrage that Neil would, as Steve put it, “pop off in public like that without coming to talk to us about his technical concerns first.” From that point on he had rebuffed all of Neil’s attempts to smoke the peace pipe. 有趣 He had blind spots, grating behavioral habits, and a tendency to give in to emotional impulse that persisted his entire life. These characteristics are often used to make the case that Steve was an “asshole” or a “jerk,” or perhaps simply “binary”—that odd adjective often used to convey the sense that he was half asshole/half genius from birth to death. These aren’t useful, interesting, or enlightening descriptions. What’s more illuminating is to take a look at the specific ways in which Steve failed to do an effective job of tempering some of his weaknesses and antisocial traits, and to consider how, when, and why some of them continued to flare up even...

黑客技术论坛推荐

原文来自知乎, 世界各大黑客技术论坛TOP排行榜 ,表示感谢 这份名单基本上囊括了目前世界上各大最佳黑客技术论坛。

360T7 刷机步骤及固件

https://cmi.hanwckf.top/p/360t7-firmware/   360T7的固件支持由immortalwrt-mt798x项目提供支持,请参考: https://cmi.hanwckf.top/p/immortalwrt-mt798x https://github.com/hanwckf/immortalwrt-mt798x 刷机步骤 参考 此处 的办法开启原厂固件的UART和telnet功能 在以下链接下载360T7测试固件(纯净版,无任何插件) https://wwd.lanzout.com/b0bt9idwd 密码:ezex (此固件已过时,请选择其它更新的固件) 接下来将刷入修改版uboot。修改版uboot的优点有: 固件分区可达108MB,原厂uboot只能使用36M 自带一个简单的webui恢复页面 到以下仓库的Release页面下载uboot,目前暂时仅支持360T7,后续将支持更多mt798x路由器。 推荐使用 mt7981_360t7-fip-fixed-parts.bin , fixed-parts 代表uboot分区表在编译期间固定,不会随着uboot环境变量变化。 https://github.com/hanwckf/bl-mt798x/releases/latest 将 mt7981_360t7-fip-fixed-parts.bin 通过HFS等方式上传到路由器,使用以下命令刷入uboot mtd write mt7981_360t7-fip-fixed-parts.bin fip 确认刷入完毕后,拔掉路由器电源。然后将电脑的IP地址设置为固定的 192.168.1.2 ,接着按住路由器的RESET按钮后通电开机,等待8s后用浏览器进入 192.168.1.1 在uboot恢复页面选择要刷入的固件。immortalwrt-mt798x目前编译两个版本的360T7固件。 建议修改版uboot直接使用 immortalwrt-mediatek-mt7981-mt7981-360-t7-108M-squashfs-factory.bin ,两种固件区别如下: mt7981-360-t7-108M 为108M固件分区,原厂uboot不可启动,需要修改版u...

写给大家看的中文排版指南

作者:Hindy 原文地址: http:// zhuanlan.zhihu.com/uici rcle/20506092 前言:很遗憾,我们的周围充斥着大量排版丑陋的文章。我国的字体排印与日本、美国等设计强国差距实在太大。我希望能够做些力所能及的小事,让更多人意识到“设计”的价值和其必要性,创造更美好的视觉环境。本文旨在帮助普及、提升大家对文字排版的认识,让大家在平时的学习工作中能有更专业的文字排版素养。 必看人群: 设计师、编辑、作家、撰稿人、教师、学生 目录: 1. 中文排版 1.1 引号 1.2 省略号与破折号 1.3 行首行尾禁则 2. 西文排版基础 2.1 西文撰写基础 2.2 西文标点相关 2.3 斜体的用法 2.4 大小写的区别 3. 中西文混排 3.1 基础原则 3.2 标点相关 1. 中文排版 1.1 引号 我国国家标准要求弯引号,个人建议使用直角引号。 示例:你竟然喜欢“苹果表”? 引号中再用引号使用双直角引号。 示例:我问他,“你竟然喜欢‘苹果表’?” 当引号表示讽刺、反语暗示时,使用弯引号(用法参考“西文排版”部分)。 示例:说真的,我也很 “喜欢”“苹果表”哦。 1.2 省略号(删节号)与破折号 省略号占两个汉字空间,包含六个点。 正确示例:中国设计还有太长路要走…… 错误示例:中国设计还有太长路要走… 破折号占两个汉字空间。 示例:中国设计还有太长路要走──加油罢。 1.3 行首行尾禁则 点号(顿号、逗号、句号等)、结束引号、结束括号等,不能出现在一行的开头。 错误示例: 排版时注意某些 符号不能在行首 ,别弄错了。 正确示例: 排版时注意某些 符号不能在行首, 别弄错了。 开始引号、开始括号、开始双书名号等,不能出现在一行的结尾。 错误示例: 她对我们说:“ 这书太赞了。” 正确示例: 她对我们说: “这书太赞了。” 2. 西文排版基础 2.1 西文撰写基础 句首字母大写。 单词间留空格。 示例:Have a question? 2.2 西文标点相关 点号后加一个空格(如逗号、句号等)。 示例:Hello everyone! Welcome to my blog....

《Becoming Steve Jobs》Chapter 17 “Just Tell Them I’m Being an Asshole”

For several months, I had been working to set up a joint interview of Steve, Andy Grove, Bill Gates, and Michael Dell. The confab was supposed to kick off the reporting for a book I had in mind. I had what I thought was a snappy title—Founders Keepers—and a plan to describe how a handful of geeky entrepreneurs had evolved into captains of industry; how self-absorbed inventors morphed into self-taught empire builders; how shaggy-haired idealists managed to stay in the saddle even as the companies they created grew rapidly by orders of magnitude, and as their own wealth and influence over the world itself became far more than the stuff of dreams. 好可惜啊,这次采访没有成形 During this time, Steve came to visit me in the hospital a couple of times. I was so addled with sedatives and painkillers and my own delirious hallucinations that during one visit I expressed my sincerest regrets at not being able to play saxophone in a Beatles retrospective show he was planning to put on in Las Vegas with Ringo S...

巴菲特致股东信-1980年

 笔记: 会计中对于下属股权公司的记账方式有3种: 持股50%以上,全部并入 持续20%--50%,则按持股比例并入 持股20%以下,则以实际收到的利润返还,计入报表 这种会计方式,会导致伯克希尔旗下,不少的企业,未能暴露实际的收益情况 对伯克希尔而言,对盈余的认定并非取决于持股比例是100%,50%,20%,5%或是1%,盈余的真正价值在于其将来再投资所能产生的效益 我们宁愿将所赚的盈余继续交由不受我们控制的人好好发挥,也不希望转由我们自己来浪费 高通货膨胀等于是对投入的资本额外课了一次税 翻译: https://xueqiu.com/6217262310/131837878 https://archive.ph/XMX5n  原文: Buffett’s Letters To Berkshire Shareholders 1980 巴菲特致股东的信 1980 年 Operating earnings improved to $41.9 million in 1980 from $36.0 million in 1979, but return on beginning equity capital (with securities valued at cost) fell to 17.8% from 18.6%. We believe the latter yardstick to be the most appropriate measure of single-year managerial economic performance. Informed use of that yardstick, however, requires an understanding of many factors, including accounting policies, historical ca...

Steve Jobs at 44, By Michael Krantz, 1999

Differences and Similarities Between Apple and Pixar Apple turns out many products--a dozen a year; if you count all the minor ones, probably a hundred. Pixar is striving to turn out one a year. But the converse of that is that Pixar's products will still be used fifty years from now, whereas I don't think you'll be using any product Apple brings to market this year fifty years from now. Pixar is making art for the ages. Kids will be watching Toy Story in the future. And Apple is much more of a constant race to continually improve things and stay ahead of the competition.  His Role At Pixar At Pixar my job is to help build the studio and recruit people and help create a situation where they can do the best work of their lives. And to some degree it's the same at Apple. But at Pixar, I don't direct the movies, whereas at Apple probably, if I had to pick a role out of a film production, I'd be the director. So it...

Interview with Steve Jobs, WGBH, 1990

Interviewer: what is it about this machine? Why is this machine so interesting? Why has it been so influential? Jobs: Ah ahm, I'll give you my point of view on it. I remember reading a magazine article a long time ago ah when I was ah twelve years ago maybe, in I think it was Scientific American . I'm not sure. And the article ahm proposed to measure the efficiency of locomotion for ah lots of species on planet earth to see which species was the most efficient at getting from point A to point B. Ah and they measured the kilocalories that each one expended. So ah they ranked them all and I remember that ahm...ah the Condor, Condor was the most efficient at [CLEARS THROAT] getting from point A to point B. And humankind, the crown of creation came in with a rather unimpressive showing about a third of the way down...