跳至主要内容

Steve Jobs: `There's Sanity Returning', 1998

Nobody can doubt the charisma of Steven P. Jobs. The interim CEO of Apple Computer Inc., who returned to the company last July after his ignominious 1985 ouster, has brought back his legendary vision, impatience, and infectious passion for the Macintosh. Jobs spoke to Business Week Correspondent Andy Reinhardt in Apple's stark, fourth-floor boardroom, just after the company rolled out its new software strategy on May 11.

Note: This is an extended, online-only version of the Q&A that appears in the May 25, 1998, issue of Business Week.

Q: Now that you've introduced the new, bold-looking iMac, are you going to do some radically different products?

A: There's a lot of talk about such things -- about handhelds, set-top boxes. A lot of computer companies have been searching for a consumer product. My view is that the personal computer has been the most successful consumer product of the last 10 years. What we have to do, what the industry stopped doing, is targeting [the consumer PC] sector of the market. IBM wants to be IBM. Dell is just selling to the corporate market, primarily. Compaq just bought DEC -- my God! There's nothing wrong with wanting to be IBM.

But Apple really beats to a different drummer. I used to say that Apple should be the Sony of this business, but in reality, I think Apple should be the Apple of this business. Apple is certainly moving closer to doing that with these new products. Also, I've had some experience in the entertainment industry because of Pixar. And I've got to tell you, the Internet is a place you go when you want to turn your brain on, and a television is a place you go when you want to turn your brain off. I'm not at all convinced that the twain will meet.

Q: The $1,299 price of the iMac, even competitive with sub-$1,000 PCs, is still not in the range of consumer electronics products.

A: No PCs are in the price range. But people are seeing the value at these prices, and our goal is to continue to lower prices on products like iMac. Part of it relates to how much of a necessity you think these devices are. And a lot of people are starting to feel that having a personal computer, especially one that is able to deliver as robust an Internet experience as the iMac can in the home, is an essential utility. An iMac costs about as much as heating a New England home in the winter, a lot less than an automobile. We're not in the sweet spot totally, but we're getting there. For Apple, this is a pretty big step. Apple hasn't had a compelling product under $2,000 for the last several years.

Q: Did you do consumer research on the iMac when you were developing it?

A: No. We have a lot of customers, and we have a lot of research into our installed base. We also watch industry trends pretty carefully. But in the end, for something this complicated, it's really hard to design products by focus groups. A lot of times, people don't know what they want until you show it to them. That's why a lot of people at Apple get paid a lot of money, because they're supposed to be on top of these things.

Q: Why did you decide against including an internal floppy drive and opt for a slower modem?

A: You know, you've got to do the right thing. Just take the floppy: People aren't thinking clearly. Nobody's going to back up a 4-gigabyte drive onto 1-megabyte floppies. They'll use a Zip drive -- but they're too expensive to build into a consumer product. Besides, hardly anybody backs up anyway, so why build cost into every system? The second reason for a floppy is software distribution, but a lot of software now comes on CD-ROMs because it's better and cheaper [the iMac includes a CD-ROM drive].

Q: How much of a role did you have in the design of the product?

A: A fair bit. [Smiles] There were several teams. On a day-to-day basis, my job wasn't to head any of them. We have really talented people to do that. But when I got here last July, it took me about two weeks to figure out that Apple didn't have a consumer product in the pipe. I began a crash program in August to create one. We put together various teams.

Q: But you smiled when I asked the question. Do you feel this is your baby?

A: We all feel like it's our baby. Everybody at Apple has a pride in it, because it represents what Apple ought to be doing. You expect this kind of innovation from Apple. Apple is getting back to that, and it's something we can all be proud of.

Q: What are you doing about increasing the number of Mac software programs?

A: Let's focus first on the real problem. Forget the perception. The real problem is that a lot of developers have had a really tough time dealing with Apple over the last few years. I talked to these folks. It wasn't even about the volume of Mac sales declining -- it was problems in dealing with Apple. We fixed almost all of that. The developers are coming back, and it feels really good. We haven't brought everybody back yet, but a lot of them.

Q: Are you going to take the CEO job permanently?

A: There's nothing new to report. I just decided one day that for me, it just wasn't such a big deal. I didn't have to lose sleep over this, worry about this. I'm Apple's interim CEO, and it won't be forever, and I'm doing the best that I can. But I'm the full-time CEO of Pixar Animation Studios, and I love it, and I also have a family. I'm doing the best I can here. If folks think there's a better solution, I'll be glad to step aside. And eventually we'll find somebody else to take the reins.

Q: What about stock ownership? Do you intend to take a stake in the company?

A: This isn't about money for me.

Q: I'm talking about the symbolic value.

A: That's not my problem. I've worked my tail off here. I don't think I could work any harder. I'm trying to help Apple. I do have more time now to be with my family. We've filled out our senior management team. We've got a good team now, and we're firing on all cylinders. And as the strategy becomes clearer to more of the people in the company, it really makes things much easier. The organization is clean and simple to understand, and very accountable. Everything just got simpler. That's been one of my mantras -- focus and simplicity. Simple can be harder than complex: You have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple. But it's worth it in the end because once you get there, you can move mountains.

Q: There's a lot of symbolism to your return. Is that going to be enough to reinvigorate the company with a sense of magic?

A: You're missing it. This is not a one-man show. What's reinvigorating this company is two things: One, there's a lot of really talented people in this company who listened to the world tell them they were losers for a couple of years, and some of them were on the verge of starting to believe it themselves. But they're not losers. What they didn't have was a good set of coaches, a good plan. A good senior management team. But they have that now.

So, the first thing to invigorating people is winning again. They're seeing us win, by the customer reactions to the products, by the sales, the profitability, all of those signs that people want what we've got again. And, that we can run our business well. That our own house is in order, that we've stopped the waste that people have seen with their own eyes without knowing what to do about it. There's sanity returning.

The second thing that's reinvigorating them is that Apple is starting to innovate again. There's been a vacuum in this industry for a long time, in many ways, and that vacuum is in a lot of areas where Apple's legacy is. So Apple is back to its roots, starting to innovate again, and people are sensing that, seeing it concretely, and really feeling good about it. That's why they came here. That's what they want to do. When they see the iMac, for example, they think we really can produce industry-leading products like this. It's not about charisma and personality, it's about results and products and those very bedrock things that are why people at Apple and outside of Apple are getting more excited about the company and what Apple stands for and what its potential is to contribute to the industry.

Q: What's the coolest stuff you have coming down the product pipe?

A: We have some pretty cool stuff coming, but we don't talk about it.

Q: Will they be computers?

A: Yes. We're not going off into la-la land.

Popular posts from 产品随想的博客

巴菲特致股东信-1980年

 笔记: 会计中对于下属股权公司的记账方式有3种: 持股50%以上,全部并入 持续20%--50%,则按持股比例并入 持股20%以下,则以实际收到的利润返还,计入报表 这种会计方式,会导致伯克希尔旗下,不少的企业,未能暴露实际的收益情况 对伯克希尔而言,对盈余的认定并非取决于持股比例是100%,50%,20%,5%或是1%,盈余的真正价值在于其将来再投资所能产生的效益 我们宁愿将所赚的盈余继续交由不受我们控制的人好好发挥,也不希望转由我们自己来浪费 高通货膨胀等于是对投入的资本额外课了一次税 翻译: https://xueqiu.com/6217262310/131837878 https://archive.ph/XMX5n  原文: Buffett’s Letters To Berkshire Shareholders 1980 巴菲特致股东的信 1980 年 Operating earnings improved to $41.9 million in 1980 from $36.0 million in 1979, but return on beginning equity capital (with securities valued at cost) fell to 17.8% from 18.6%. We believe the latter yardstick to be the most appropriate measure of single-year managerial economic performance. Informed use of that yardstick, however, requires an understanding of many factors, including accounting policies, historical ca...

Apple's One-Dollar-a-Year Man, By Steve Jobs, 2000

(FORTUNE Magazine) – Now that Steve Jobs has showed his hand on Apple's Internet and system software strategies and dropped the "interim" from his title, other questions loom. He's always denied it, but isn't it true that his old company, Next, did wind up taking over Apple? Will there ever be an encore to the 15-year-old Macintosh? Short of that, does Apple have any plans to jump into the "Internet appliance" fray? Will Apple ever build computers for business people again? And what, pray tell, does Steve think of all these young Internet zillionaires? Let's ask. Practically every technology that your old company, Next, possessed when Apple acquired it in 1997 is now being used by Apple in some strategic way. This must seem like sweet vindication.  The thing about Next was that we produced something that was truly brilliant for an audience that our heart really wasn't into selling to--namely, the enterprise. I suppose if you were wr...

产品爱好者周刊 第26期:PRISM, XKeyscore, Trust No One

  Products Gitea - Git with a cup of tea   https://gitea.io/en-us/ A painless self-hosted Git service. 自建Git服务,避免GitHub隐私侵犯 https://github.com/objective-see/LuLu LuLu is the free macOS firewall 监视Mac的出站流量,且阻断 OverSight   https://github.com/objective-see/OverSight OverSight monitors a mac's mic and webcam, alerting the user when the internal mic is activated, or whenever a process accesses the webcam. 监视是否有应用调用Mac的麦克风、摄像头 Mozilla Hubs   https://github.com/mozilla/hubs The client-side code for Mozilla Hubs, an online 3D collaboration platform that works for desktop, mobile, and VR platforms. 开源的多人虚拟空间,Mozilla打造,企业级VR诉求 数字移民   https://shuziyimin.org 关于内容源、工具的推荐,适合刚接入国际的新人 SimpleLogin   https://simplelogin.io/ 匿名邮箱工具,转发用,Michael Bazzell推荐 Telegram 群组、频道、机器人 - 汇总分享   https://congcong0806.github.io/2018/04/24/Telegram/#机器人-bot https://archive.ph/iJMBj 献给那些将来到Telegram的朋友 Design Patrick Wardle   https://www.instagram.com/patrickwardle/?hl=en 他的IG,摄影也精彩,审美...

SS机场常用服务器线路微普及

原文link:https://www.duyaoss.com/archives/57/   为何写这么个帖子? 更新时间:2019-11-29 由于机场用户增多,很多新用户压根不懂节点上面的名字代表什么,也不知道什么服务器比较适合自己,不懂什么是原生,等等。 所以开一个小帖,稍微介绍一下比较常见的服务器, 专业知识有限,所以只是给小白们介绍一下,其实我也很白,各位大佬见笑了。 在这里尤其感谢 Sukka 苏卡卡大佬和喵酱指导,以及 Nexitally 佩奇提供的资料介绍,否则我真不知道从哪儿开始动笔。后面地区内容都是佩奇帮忙码出来的。时间有限,慢慢再继续填充和修整 本文仅仅是抛砖引玉写一些机场主们告知我的 ISP、IDC 的体验,仅供参考。网络环境每天都在变化,今天飞快的服务器明天有可能龟速,有写的不对或者过时的地方还望大家指正。所以本文也算是一些机场主们把曾经踩过的坑分享给大家吧。(本来是想给小白写服务器介绍的,佩奇大佬写着写着就专业惯性的转到了商家哈哈哈,这是一个悲伤的故事) 测速图 Telegram 频道: https://t.me/DuyaoSS 主用链接: DuyaoSS - 毒药机场简介博客 常见名词: IPLC: "International Private Leased Circuit"的缩写,即“国际专线”。不过大部分机场通常看到的iplc,都只是阿里的经典网络,跨数据中心内网互通,阿里内网,并不是严格意义的iplc专线;当然也有其他渠道的,或真iplc,不过比较少。阿里云的内网互通底层原理是通过采购多个点对点的iplc专线,来连接各个数据中心,从而把各个数据中心纳入到自己的一套内网里面来。这样做有两个好处,其一是iplc链路上的带宽独享,完全不受公网波动影响,其二是过境的时候不需要经过GFW,确保了数据安全且不受外界各种因素干扰。但是需要注意一下阿里云的iplc也是有带宽上限的,如果过多的人同时挤到同一条专线上,峰值带宽超过专线的上限的话也同样会造成网络不稳定。其他渠道购买到的iplc价格很高,阿里云内网这种性价比超高这种好东西且用且珍惜。 IEPL国际以太网专线(International Ethernet Private Line,简称IEPL),构建于MSTP设备平台上...

360T7 刷机步骤及固件

https://cmi.hanwckf.top/p/360t7-firmware/   360T7的固件支持由immortalwrt-mt798x项目提供支持,请参考: https://cmi.hanwckf.top/p/immortalwrt-mt798x https://github.com/hanwckf/immortalwrt-mt798x 刷机步骤 参考 此处 的办法开启原厂固件的UART和telnet功能 在以下链接下载360T7测试固件(纯净版,无任何插件) https://wwd.lanzout.com/b0bt9idwd 密码:ezex (此固件已过时,请选择其它更新的固件) 接下来将刷入修改版uboot。修改版uboot的优点有: 固件分区可达108MB,原厂uboot只能使用36M 自带一个简单的webui恢复页面 到以下仓库的Release页面下载uboot,目前暂时仅支持360T7,后续将支持更多mt798x路由器。 推荐使用 mt7981_360t7-fip-fixed-parts.bin , fixed-parts 代表uboot分区表在编译期间固定,不会随着uboot环境变量变化。 https://github.com/hanwckf/bl-mt798x/releases/latest 将 mt7981_360t7-fip-fixed-parts.bin 通过HFS等方式上传到路由器,使用以下命令刷入uboot mtd write mt7981_360t7-fip-fixed-parts.bin fip 确认刷入完毕后,拔掉路由器电源。然后将电脑的IP地址设置为固定的 192.168.1.2 ,接着按住路由器的RESET按钮后通电开机,等待8s后用浏览器进入 192.168.1.1 在uboot恢复页面选择要刷入的固件。immortalwrt-mt798x目前编译两个版本的360T7固件。 建议修改版uboot直接使用 immortalwrt-mediatek-mt7981-mt7981-360-t7-108M-squashfs-factory.bin ,两种固件区别如下: mt7981-360-t7-108M 为108M固件分区,原厂uboot不可启动,需要修改版u...

Albert Einstein Said Death Is Not An End Can Prompt You To Find The Meaning and Purpose Of Your Life

原文Link: https://quotationize.com/albert-einstein-said-death-not-end/ 产品随想注: 爱因斯坦对于死亡的观点,深深影响了乔布斯  ---------------- Albert Einstein said death is not an end if we can live on in our children and the younger generation is a line taken from the letter which he wrote to the widow of physicist Heike Kamerlingh Onnes in 1926. Besides death, he also talked about afterlife, immortality and soul. If you have read through my authentic collection of Albert Einstein thoughts on God and religion , you would know that he rejected the formal, dogmatic religion. Einstein did not believe in immortality of the individual. According to him, there is no such thing as, punishment for misdeeds or rewards for good behavior in any afterlife. For him, the so-called Theosophy and Spiritualism, was no more than a symptom of weakness and confusion. As Einstein explained that since our inner experiences consist of reproductions, and combinations of sensory impressions, the concept of a soul with...

Interview with Steve Jobs, WGBH, 1990

Interviewer: what is it about this machine? Why is this machine so interesting? Why has it been so influential? Jobs: Ah ahm, I'll give you my point of view on it. I remember reading a magazine article a long time ago ah when I was ah twelve years ago maybe, in I think it was Scientific American . I'm not sure. And the article ahm proposed to measure the efficiency of locomotion for ah lots of species on planet earth to see which species was the most efficient at getting from point A to point B. Ah and they measured the kilocalories that each one expended. So ah they ranked them all and I remember that ahm...ah the Condor, Condor was the most efficient at [CLEARS THROAT] getting from point A to point B. And humankind, the crown of creation came in with a rather unimpressive showing about a third of the way down...

《Becoming Steve Jobs》Chapter 16 Blind Spots, Grudges, and Sharp Elbows

Steve could be pretty thin-skinned when someone prominent criticized the aesthetics of his products. He took great umbrage that Neil would, as Steve put it, “pop off in public like that without coming to talk to us about his technical concerns first.” From that point on he had rebuffed all of Neil’s attempts to smoke the peace pipe. 有趣 He had blind spots, grating behavioral habits, and a tendency to give in to emotional impulse that persisted his entire life. These characteristics are often used to make the case that Steve was an “asshole” or a “jerk,” or perhaps simply “binary”—that odd adjective often used to convey the sense that he was half asshole/half genius from birth to death. These aren’t useful, interesting, or enlightening descriptions. What’s more illuminating is to take a look at the specific ways in which Steve failed to do an effective job of tempering some of his weaknesses and antisocial traits, and to consider how, when, and why some of them continued to flare up even...

产品随想 | 周刊 第85期:e-Residency与数字游民

  David Shambaugh   https://www.google.com/search?q=David+Shambaugh 中国问题研究专家,著作极多 郭玉闪   https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/郭玉闪?useskin=vector 中国公共知识分子 我只想好好观影   github.com/BetterWorld-Liuser/autoMovies 刘煜辉:中国资本市场灵魂出窍 最有活力的公司几乎不在A股   https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/marketresearch/2017-06-23/doc-ifyhmtek7705574.shtml 回看17年的专家讲话,还是挺有水平的,挺多都认可 纽约文化沙龙   https://www.youtube.com/@user-cu2hl5tf6y/videos 视频质量出奇的高,推荐 透视中国政治by吴国光、程晓农 备忘下,貌似评价挺好的一本书 CAPI China Chair Wu Guoguang (吴国光 / 吳國光)   https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLIt1szHhnm_Hso3jGUbfGpnEAbsPOuEVV 因为热爱中国,我们越要看懂中国 AI Canon   https://a16z.com/2023/05/25/ai-canon/ in this post, we’re sharing a curated list of resources we’ve relied on to get smarter about modern AI. We call it the “AI Canon” because these papers, blog posts, courses, and guides have had an outsized impact on the field over the past several years. 希望中国的投資機構,也能有更多的分享與輸出,提升整個社會的認知 Cantonese Font 粵語字體   https://visual-fonts.com/zh/...